Archive for the ‘Academics’ Category

Homework Helpers

Saturday, November 13th, 2010

Parents are stepping aside, relegating what once was seen as a mom and/or dad imperative to a relative stranger known as a homework helper.   Really–and not to be confused with a tutor.

A tutor comes to the task with a specific expertise or two.  For instance, many kids hit a math wall when algebra is added to their rosters or have trouble comprehending their textbooks.  If a parent doesn’t get it either, then a tutor is paid to come rescue the situation.

But such is not the case here.  As explained in the New York Times article, “Like a Monitor More Than a Tutor,” homework helpers are not teachers with an expertise in a certain subject area.  Think of them, instead, as generalists and perhaps even task masters.  As New York City’s Central Park Tutors’ co-owner Mike Wallach explains it:  “This niche industry caters to students who are capable of doing the work but need someone there who can just be there with them to consistently do the work in a regular manner.”

The company’s site puts it this way:  “[Along with tutoring services] for those who need it, we also have experience focusing on organization, learning disabilities, emotional frustration, or lack of interest.” 

Homework helper or parent substitute?  You decide.

The School Trend of Bypassing Failure

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

Many of us believe that failure is highly underrated, that inherent in a dismal showing are lessons to be learned.  But in a number of districts across the country, failure’s reach is limited by design.

For instance, many Texas districts establish minimum grades of 50, 60, or even 70 for assignments and report cards.  In other words, fail, then get a grade boost.

Apparently, such administrators believe that by thus helping students bypass failure, they will feel better about themselves, work harder, and meet success.

If only it were that simple.  Unfortunately, many kids figure out the system and play it like a fiddle, getting away with minimal effort, yet receiving the same grade as other students who work their butts off to pass.

Down there in Texas, Republican Jane Nelson doesn’t think that’s fair, so last year she sponsored legislation to prevent districts from setting these minimum grades, and her efforts are supported by the state’s education commissioner, Robert Scott.

National Education Association-Dallas board member, Diane Birdwell agrees and says, “We have now raised a group of students through the school system that know if you do nothing, you get a 50.  I don’t know any job that pays me half my salary for doing nothing.”

The districts in question are fighting back, though, so stay tuned.  Hopefully, they’ll lose in court, so that  whatever students earn ends up being the grades that appear on their assignments, tests, and report cards.

Valedictorians by the Number

Thursday, July 1st, 2010

In the good old days, the top grade earner in any given senior class, in any given year, was always #1–a singular distinction that came with the title valedictorian.  Come in second and be named salutatorian.  But these are new days and the old rules apparently don’t apply anymore.  Which, to my way of thinking, is a shame.

Nowadays, competition is getting a bad rap and self-esteem considerations reign with the result that, across the country, schools are naming multiple valedictorians.  Really.

Take for example:

  • Stratford High School (Houston suburbs) honored 30 valedictorians this year–6.5% of the senior class!
  • Harrison High School (north of NYC) named 13 valedictorians in a class of 221 students.
  • St. Vrain Valley District (Colorado)  named 94 valedictorians!

As reported by Winnie Hu in her “How Many Graduates Does It Take to Be No.1,” Don Haddad, St. Vrain Valley District’s superintendent said, “We have not lowered the bar to achieve more valedictorians.  More kids are now getting over the bar.”

I just don’t see it that way.  To my way of thinking, doing so dilutes the distinction usually attributed to that honor, laying it to waste.

In the real world, there will always be a top dog, a numero uno, a star who steals the show–but, apparently, that’s a lesson a number of our schools refuse to teach.